Talk:Roast turkey

Requesting Page Deletion
Requesting page deletion as article does not fit Citizendium standards. Mary Ash 04:15, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Impetuous; don't delete - you worked hard on the content, which should be integrated elsewhere. Aleta Curry 05:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * That didn't work with Marian apparitions, and I hope it won't work here. The information just needs to be put in the right place, not deleted. David Finn 06:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Mary, you should already know that requesting to delete this page is not what is to be done. Thus I have moved the page to the /Recipes subpage.
 * You have put much effort into this page and collected material, but it needs more work to shape it into a good recipes page. So, please, do not just leave it behind but continue to work on it (with the help of the community). You may take your time, of course -- there is no deadline to meet!
 * --Peter Schmitt 08:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No, Peter I did not know that an author could request a page deletion. How do you request a page be deleted? I plan no more work on this article as it does not meet Citizendium standards. The one thing I learned in life, so far, is to know when to cut your losses. I am moving onto to other articles to write. Again, how do you request a page deletion? I searched Citizendium and could find nothing to enlighten me on this subject. Thanks!Mary Ash 14:39, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Perhaps you should re-read what Peter has written - he said requesting page deletion was not what is to be done.
 * Oh, and if you want to know how to request deletion of a page, ask the person who placed the speedy delete tag on the article. Speedy delete tags are how you do it. David Finn 14:56, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * David I AM the person who requested the speedy delete and it was refused.Mary Ash 15:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

(undent) In any event, the page deletion criteria for non-Editors are restricted to those that are listed for Constables on their own authority. Editors have more, but still restricted categories. Given the number of people who have worked on content here, it is not plausible to say the article is not appropriate for Citizendium. It is being reworked, however, into a style more consistent with that of other food articles on Citizendium. Howard C. Berkowitz 20:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Title Change to Roast turkey
Requesting title change to Roast turkey. The current title is inaccurate as roast turkey is eaten worldwide. As shown the British have been eating roast turkey back in the time of King Henry VIII and is still eaten today. The directions for preparing a roast turkey could be used by anyone, in any country, at any time, especially since the metric and Gas Mark measurements are now included.Mary Ash 14:52, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Section move needed
Turkey factoids should be at turkey (bird). The section also needs to be reviewed as people have time and better sources cited as the one used is very general. Aleta Curry 20:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. I'll move them. My opinions about factoids are mixed, but I didn't want to lose them and they were rather lonely on the recipes page. Howard C. Berkowitz 20:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Oops! Cross post. Howard, I've moved them, see below. Aleta Curry 20:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

'Turkey Factoids' Moved to domestic turkey
I've moved this section to the stub domestic turkey. I had started that without metadata deliberately, pending the conclusion of the great turkey debates. So, that can very easily be cut/moved/deleted/pasted somewhere else, whatever is finally decided. I'm not making any determinations what that should be, only that the factoids shouldn't be at roast turkey. Aleta Curry 20:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

text box
Howard, I dunno what you're trying to do, or how to fix it. So let's leave the quotation as it is until we find a guru who can do it. Thanks.Hayford Peirce 21:31, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, I'll comment it out for now and make it a quotation. It didn't belong as a major subhead. Howard C. Berkowitz 21:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, it sure doesn't belong where you have stuck it now, either, right in the middle of something else entirely, with absolutely no explanation of what it's doing there. Hayford Peirce 21:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I think it's very much in context. It makes a transition from the small turkeys of the past to the industrial of today.


 * As a matter of personal style, while I'm fine with lighthearted content, headers are for information indexing or retrieval. Put the lighthearted into the body of text, into a text box (probably preferred) or quotation when it is a quotation. Howard C. Berkowitz 22:01, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Turkey and all that
I try to recapitulate:
 * 1) Mary creates Roast turkey -- a how-to page
 * Yes


 * 1) Hayford considers the page as ethnocentric and moves it to Roast turkey (American) -- obviously he considers such a page title as justified
 * Yes. If you had read the article in question, you would have agreed 100%. It was purely about American turkeys, holidays, and preparation, with a lot of material about American foods. It made perfect sense to move it to its new name.


 * 1) Mary adds more recipes
 * Yes.


 * 1) The talk page shows: most agree that this belongs on a subpage
 * Yes.


 * 1) Mary requests to delete both the page and the talk page
 * Yes.


 * 1) I (and others) point out that deleting is not justified
 * Yes.


 * 1) I move the page to Roast turkey (American)/Recipes and -- to avoid an empty main page -- I write a one-sentence lead.
 * Yes.


 * 1) I move the no longer current talk page to an archive.
 * Apparently Yes -- I'm not certain of all the moves.


 * 1) Hayford now considers the page as no longer ethnocentric
 * Yes -- because the page, as redone by Peter and others no longer WAS ethnocentric. All of the American recipes and references had been move to the "Recipes" tab and the remaining text was a couple of bland statements about roast turkey in general. There was, therefore, absolutely no reason to retain "(American)" in the title of the article.


 * 1) Instead of developing an American-centered page (the recipes are still ethnocentric!), Hayford changes his mind and wants to move the cluster back.
 * Why should I possibly WANT TO develop an American-centered page?! That's what I was PROTESTING about! The ethnocentric recipes (and TEXT) were now hidden by the Recipes tab. So, logically, since the article was no longer ethnocentric, there was no longer any reason to retain its title.


 * 1) Since this does not work immediately, and instead of making room for the move, he is impatient and copies main page and talk page to the intended name and requests to delete these pages
 * Yes. I admit to this grave fault.  So take me out and shoot me.  Or ban me from Citizendium.


 * 1) Howard objects, and I object because this would destroy the history of the pages and would leave the subpage and the talk page archive orphaned
 * Yes. But I thought you were objecting about the SUBJECT changes, not picayune History changes.  Once again, take me out and shoot me.


 * 1) Hayford copies the Recipes subpage, as well.
 * Well, of course! My whole point of doing this was to change the WHOLE article and all of its subpages from one Title to another. There are now NO ORPHANED SUBPAGES.


 * 1) After that, the copies are changed as well, so that they have a history of their own
 * I have no idea of what happened to copies, etc. I can't believe that this is an issue worth spending ten seconds of our time on. Hayford Peirce 16:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

In addition, we have turkey (bird), turkey dinner, and domestic turkey. ''Don't forget Wild Turkey which should be bourbon. Aleta Curry 00:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. Thank you for doing that -- it tried to create order out of chaos. Hayford Peirce 16:51, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Before continuing to develop turkey-related content it is necessary to find an agreement: What pages should exist, and what should be their content?
 * From what I have learned from American movies and literature, a page on American roast turkey seems to be justified
 * Possibly, but not necessarily so. Why would we have a page on ROAST American turkey and not ROAST English turkey or ROAST French turkey?  Why not simply retain the now-existing page Roast turkey?  We might have a page on American Thanksgiving and a section on turkeys.


 * Obviously, a more general page should exist, too. Perhaps turkey (fowl) for culinary issues parallel to turkey (bird).
 * These pages now already exist. And could be expanded.


 * Should there be a Roast turkey (international), too? domestic turkey?
 * See above comments -- these pages already exist.

I believe firmly in preserving the history of articles.
 * I do too -- BUT there has been a slight mix-up here concerning a newly created article (three days old, four days old?) and CZ's foundations will not crumble if a little of the History has disappeared or is deeply inaccessible. At least not in my opinion.

When there is agreement on titles and corresponding content we shall have to decide where to archive what currently exists. Comments? --Peter Schmitt 23:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. My own opinion is that we retain the Roast turkey article as it is. The Recipes part of it needs further work, EXTENSIVE work, to reformat the recipes. If you want to make this International, I can stick in a couple of French, English, and Mexican recipes.  I further believe that all traces of the Roast turkey (American) article should be vanished as if they had never existed.  Except, if you can find it, the History. But where you stick that in, I have no idea. Hayford Peirce 17:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Howard is too chicken to continue this discussion and ducks out. Just crow when the rest of you have decided. I have been accused of being birdbrained when roasting turkey and probably have little to contribute. Howard C. Berkowitz 23:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Aleta doesn't remember actually having been called a turkey - certainly not recently, but I have no stake in roast turkey. I am completely open-minded about turkey clusters. Aleta Curry 00:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Turkey clusters? Pieces of turkey stuck together and covered with chocolate? Howard knows about turkey mole, but that's the extent of his turkey-chocolate experience.

(undent) Again, let me know which pages to delete and which to merge. This is not going to be easy, I'm sure. D. Matt Innis 16:07, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Reply to Hayford
Hayford, I didn't make the list to accuse you. I made it to explain and justify why I am against deleting the pages, and why I think that there is a need for a plan ...

We only disagree on one, a rather, minor issue: I think that even such cases the history should be preserved (and that it would have been easier done by moves).

--Peter Schmitt 21:53, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, okay, thanks! I really don't know what to suggest to clear this whole thing up 100% though.... Hayford Peirce 22:40, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Recipes
The Recipes subpage needs heavy revision -- whether as subpage of this article or another. --Peter Schmitt 23:50, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. Hayford Peirce 22:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Factoids
The "factoids" were copied from one or two websites. They cannot be considered as reliable "facts" without further research. --Peter Schmitt 23:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I've moved them temporarily, you may already have noticed, if not, please see above. Aleta Curry 00:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I strongly disagree. The facts were researched and written by me. There is no plagiarism involved and I am sorry you feel that I would commit such a serious sin of poor writing.Mary Ash 16:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * On re-reading I see you do not accept NPR or the turkey growers in Minnesota as reliable sources. I suspect both sources would know a thing about history and turkeys.Mary Ash 16:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Mary, you will have to develop the habit of reading what people write carefully before taking umbrage. Otherwise you'll never be happy here and you'll continue to make other people unhappy.
 * Please refer to my post of 16 October 2010, above. Please.
 * Stop being defensive! Nobody accused you of plagiarism or the 'serious sin of poor writing'.
 * I do not wish to speak for Peter, but when the very first line of 'facts' states that Henry VIII popularised the eating of Turkeys at Christmas in England, he's well within his rights to question how reliable the additions are.
 * Aleta Curry 22:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Corrected Stuffings to Stuffing
Corrected the word stuffings to stuffing. Sources:


 * http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stuffings?show=0&t=1287338814
 * http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/stuffing_2
 * Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, 1989
 * http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_us1295111#m_en_us1295111

Added reference concerning deep fat fried turkey
Add a source supporting the claim that deep fat frying a turkey is dangerous. Used the National Fire Protection Association as a source. And as a personal note, a regional off-duty firefighter was severely burned and lost most of his house Thanksgiving Day as he was trying to deep fat fry a turkey. Instead he burned his house down and ended up at the regional burn center. This method of cooking is very dangerous and not recommended.Mary Ash 18:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

French methods of roasting turkey
I think you're wrong about this. I lived in Tahiti for 25 years and everyone I knew who roasted a turkey did it exactly as an American would, with a little liquid in the bottom of the pan at some point, but they weren't doing anything more than that to make them "moist". By that, do you mean "braise"? It's possible, of course, but I never heard of it, anymore than I see "braised turkey" on the menus of restaurants. Probably a better way of cooking them, of course, but braising isn't roasting.... Hayford Peirce 20:21, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The French recipe found online has the addition of a small amount of liquid with a covered roaster when roasting the turkey. James Peterson's recipe uses a dry roast recipe with turkey covered with butter aluminum foil. He also suggests adding a small amount of liquid, if the meat juices begin to burn.Mary Ash 21:03, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, that's what I thought it would be. I really don't think that this method should be called "moist", since there are probably a million US recipes that call for a small amount of water, or stock, or white wine, or something. But we can leave it as it is for the moment while we think about it. Hayford Peirce 22:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Sounds good and thank you!Mary Ash 22:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Additional turkey factoid sources

 * Ben Franklin and the turkey: http://www.fi.edu/franklin/birthday/faq.html#21 The Franklin Institute
 * http://www.statesymbolsusa.org/Alabama/bird_wildTurkey.html State Symbols of the USA
 * Memorable Quotes 1776 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068156/quotes
 * Caliber Journal (UC Press) http://caliber.ucpress.net/doi/abs/10.1525/gfc.2006.6.4.19
 * Smithsonian http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/food/2009/07/03/ben-franklin-patriot-foodie/

American or international
If you think that there should be only one article I do not object.

But my personal impression is that -- while roast turkey is eaten all over the world -- it has a special significance for North America. Thus, I think, one international article (not several!) and one on American issues would be justified. (At least the recipe subpages should be split!)

For instance, here in middle Europe, turkey is eaten, but seldom prepared as a whole. This is rather replaced by the (rather smaller) goose, often at Christmas, and traditionally mid-November (St. Martin's Day). For greater parties, usually a suckling pig is taken.

--Peter Schmitt 22:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not disagreeing with you about the goose or any other bird. The article address the turkey and so the article will be about the turkey. BTW I just lost about three hours research trying to justify why the factoid segment is accurate and well researched. Sigh...Mary Ash 22:32, 17 October 2010 (UTC)