User talk:ElectionJune2014/Referenda/2

"compare its content and quality with comparable articles in other encyclopedias, including Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica online"


 * Not encouraging start. WP is certainly not reliable (it says so itself, so it must be true). EB isn't either (I can give examples if you like, though those would be from the print edition, as the online one seems to be subscription-only (last I tried)). What should be checked against is the most specialist material available. Peter Jackson 10:14, 5 June 2014 (UTC)