Taxation

Taxation is used to finance public expenditure or to service the national debt; and it can be used to promote personal and social welfare, alter conduct, or  change the distribution of income or wealth. It affects the decisions of households to save, supply labour and invest in human capital, and the decisions of firms to produce, create jobs, invest and innovate. Nearly all forms of taxation can be expected to have adverse effects on productivity and economic growth.

Introduction
This article deals with the social and microeconomic  effects of   taxation at  a given state  of  public expenditure. The macroeconomic effects of taxation, and the   effects  of  varying combinations of taxation,   public expenditure and debt,   are dealt with in the article on fiscal policy. A glossary of the terms shown in italics in this article is available on the related articles subpage

Personal income tax
Personal income tax accounts for about 25 per cent of the average tax receipts of the OECD countries. Taxable income is defined in a variety of ways, with many different allowances, exemptions and deductions. Tax rates are generally progressive, usually starting after a tax-free range for the lowest incomes, and followed by a sequence of higher rates as successive "thresholds" are exceeded, to reach maximum (and marginal) rates that are mostly between 40 per cent and 60 per cent. Income from investments and income from employment are sometimes treated differently and there is sometimes special treatment for the elderly. The total "tax wedge" between employees' take-home pay and total labour costs to employers (including employee and employer social security contributions) ranges for most OECD countries to between 25 and 50 per cent of employers labour costs.

Social security contributions
Social security contributions account for about 24 per cent of the average tax receipts of the OECD countries. They include employees and employers contributions toward: - The total of employees' and employers social security contributions amounts for most OECD countries to between 10 and 30 per cent of employers' labour costs.
 * unemployment insurance benefits;
 * accident, injury and sickness benefits;
 * old-age, disability and survivors’ pensions;
 * family allowances: and,
 * reimbursements for medical and hospital expenses or provision of hospital or medical services.

Corporate income tax
Corporate income tax accounts for about 11 per cent of the average tax receipts of the OECD countries and tax rates are mainly between 15 per cent and 35 percent. As for personal taxation, many different ways of defining taxable income have been adopted,  often with allowances for depreciation or research and development and with  "tax breaks" for selected commercial activities, and with special treatment of small busineses. In principle there are also the options of "source-based", "residence-based" or "destination-based" systems (ie related to the location of the parent company, residence of the investor or the location of the final sale).

Taxes on consumption
Taxes on consumption (also known as "indirect taxes") have generally been increasing in recent years, and now account for about 25 per cent of the average tax receipts of the OECD countries. They include It is common practice to exempt commodities on which poor people spend relatively high proportions of their income, such as food and childrens'clothing.
 * sales taxes (mainly in the US);
 * value added tax - that is immediately paid on purchases at all stages of the supply chain, but subsequently deducted at all stages except purchases by the final consumer (in use in all OECD countries except the US);
 * excise taxes - that are paid only on purchases of specified categories of product, such as tobacco and alcohol and petrol;
 * tariffs - that are paid on imported goods (mainly agricultural products).

Taxes on wealth and property
The principal categories of redistributive taxes on property and personal wealth are:
 * Taxes on fixed property (real estate)
 * Taxes on net wealth and capital gains
 * Estate duty, inheritance tax, gift tax
 * Taxes on financial and capital transactions

Environmental taxation
Among the taxes that have been adopted in pursuit of environmental objectives are:
 * Taxes on energy use.  European Union law requires member states  to use "financial instruments" to bring about reductions in the use of energy in pursuit of a target reduction of 9 per cent over a period of 9 years . Implementation is being attempted partly by taxation - for example, the UKs Climate Change Levy
 * Carbon taxes. Taxes design to reduce the emission of carbon dioxide and other "greenhouse gases" have been introduced in a number of European and Commonwealth countries and in some member states of the United States, but  "tradable permit" schemes  provide an alternative that is widely favoured ,
 * Landfill taxes.   European law sets limits upon the amount of  biodegradable municipal  waste that member states may send to landfill sites.

The effects of taxation
Every combination of the various forms of taxation has a different effect upon welfare, but they all have certain common features. In the terminology of economic theory, each of them has an income effect, and most of them have  substitution effects. The income effect is the reduction in the resources available to taxpayers that is brought about by the transfer of resources to government. It occurs, therefore, without affecting the total of the country's resources. The substitution effect, on the other hand, may result in a reduction in the country's resources by bringing about a move to less productive activity. An increase in income tax may, for example, induce a skilled worker to reduce his working hours and spend more time on untaxed do-it-yourself activities. The resulting reduction in output would have the indirect effect of reducing national welfare. The substitution effect may alternatively have  a direct effect of welfare by prompting taxpayers to buy products other than those that they would otherwise prefer. A tax on biscuits, for example, may prompt buyers to switch to an untaxed but less enjoyable product, such as bread. The size of the substitution effect depends upon the extent to which the tax varies with a level of activity (the marginal tax rate) and to the responsiveness of the level of that activity to its price (the elasticity of supply or demand). Taxes that have no effect upon supply or demand, such as a land-value tax or a poll tax, have no substitution effect, and activities whose level is relatively insensitive to price (such as purchases of bread) have relatively small substitution effects. Other things being equal the more numerous the persons or activities on which the tax is leveled (ie the larger the tax base), the smaller is likely to be the substitution effect because the lower are the marginal tax rates

A second common feature is the effect of taxation upon the distribution of income and wealth. Taxation may be expected to alter the distribution  of income or wealth. The term ‘’vertical distribution’’ refers to distribution among people having different levels of income,  and the term ‘’progressive tax’’ denotes a tax which bears progressively  more heavily on  higher- income  taxpayers. However, a tax which is the same whatever the taxpayer’s income, such as a poll tax, is termed ‘’regressive’’ because  it is harder for  low-income taxpayers to afford  it. The term ‘’horizontal distribution’’ is correspondingly taken to refer to the distribution of  taxation among  taxpayers who have similar levels of income,  but  the term is open to a variety of interpretations. The reduction of, or exemption from,  tax liability  for specific classes of  potential taxpayer is often referred to as a ‘’tax break’’ and is indistinguishable from subsidies in favour of those classes. Tax breaks for specific activities, such as research and agriculture  - or  for  specific  classes of  organisation,  such as charities,  are intended to encourage those activities or organisations;  and tax breaks  for specific classes of individual  such as the elderly or mothers with small children, are often intended to alter  vertical distribution.

The burden of taxation may not be confined to those who pay the tax, however. Producers may be able to pass a part of any tax increase  taxes on to consumers by increasing prices or on to employees by reducing wages, and  employees may be able to pass a part of any income tax increase on to producers by raising wages. The extent to which such shifting of the tax burden occurs depends upon conditions in the relevant product and  labour markets.

Aggregate effects
It is generally accepted that endogenous growth theory provides a strong presumption that the net effect of taxation is to reduce economic growth as a result, for example, of its negative influence upon innovation and upon the development of human capital. A survey of the empirical evidence has concluded, however, that it does not support that aggregate presumption, although it does throw light upon the effects of some tax instruments. .

Personal income tax and social security contributions
Taxes on employment income and compulsory contributions to social security schemes can affect the supply of labour as a result both of their price effect - to the extent that they makes  employees try  to compensate for their loss of after-tax earnings - and their substitution effect  - to the extent that they make employees willing to sacrifice their reduced net earnings  in exchange for the  benefits of increased leisure. Empirical evidence tends to indicate that income tax has a negative effect that is larger for females than for males, and that it is greater for both when tax rates are progressive. The combined influence of employment income taxation and means-tested  state benefits can also reduce the supply of labour as a result of the operation of the unemployment and poverty traps. Taxes on employment income can also affect the demand for labour as a result of the tax wedge that is driven between he cost of labour to employers and the net payment received by employees. The magnitude of the effect upon unemployment depends upon the price flexibility in the relevant labour market, because it depends upon the extent to which employees are able to pass a tax increase on to their employers. There is also evidence that high tax rates for low earners can increase unemployment among low-skilled employees, especially at relatively high levels of the  minimum wage.

The substitution effect of personal taxation may be expected to reduce the motive for saving as a result of the reduced after-tax return but the income effect may prompt an increase in savings in order to preserve a desired level of retirement income. Empirical evidence concerning the magnitude of the net effect has yielded widely differing findings but there is general agreement that the outcome is a reduction in savings. There is also some evidence to suggest that income tax may reduce human capital as a result of its effect upon the willingness of parents to spend money on their children.

The above effects suggest the possibility that high marginal tax rates have negative consequences for productivity, and an OECD study has indicated that progressive income tax does, in fact, cause significant reductions in GDP per head (in addition to any effects arising from the reduced acquisition of human capital), .

Corporation tax
There is no apparent advantage to be gained from adding a tax on company profit to its taxation as part of personal income taxation - although it  was suggested in the Meade Report that it might be considered to be a payment for the privileges of limited liability. Corporate taxation may be expected to reduce productivity in several ways. It can alter the relative costs of capital and labour in such a way as to move resources into less productive activities. It imposes compliance costs on firms and administrative costs on governments, thereby diverting resources away from productive activities. It may reduce incentives to invest and   innovate, and it may  impair technology transfer by deterring foreign direct investment. The deductability of interest payments favours established corporations that can readily finance their investments by borrowing at the expense of innovative, knowledge-based and recently established firms that are riskier or less able to provide collateral, so have to obtain most of their funding from shareholders. In fact empirical evidence at the firm level and at the industry level confirms the conclusion that corporate taxation reduces productivity. However, alternative forms of corporate taxation (such as the use of 100% "capital allowances" or the adoption of "flow-of-funds" taxation ) may mitigate some of the above effects.

Taxes on consumption
Consumption taxes do not affect savings because they apply the same rate to current spending as they do to future spending, and a uniform tax on all purchases would  not be  expected to affect economic activity, except for the possibility that their effect on purchasing power might  add to labour costs as a result of wage bargaining. However, no consumption tax  effect was   revealed by a recent empirical study of the effect of taxation on employment. Consumption taxes are considered  "regressive",  to the extent that  they are levied on goods that account for a relatively high proportion of the spending of poorer families - and exemptions of selected products are sometimes introduced to mitigate that effect.

Property taxes
Taxes on land and buildings may be expected to be more conducive to growth than income taxes because they have much smaller harmful effects  on decisions  to supply labour, to invest in human capital, and to produce, invest and innovate;  and recent empirical evidence has confirmed that they  particularly conducive to economic growth. They also have the merit of being cheap to collect and hard to evade. However, taxes on housing, in particular, tend to be unpopular because of their visibility and their effect upon low-income householders; and in some countries there have even been proposals for their replacement by income tax. A tax on gains arising from increases in the unimproved value of land (as recommended in the UK by the "Barker Review of Housing Supply" ) should not raise such objections, and, by discouraging  the practice of holding land out of use for speculative purposes, it could release land for housing and help to stabilise the housing market.

In contrast, taxes on financial and capital transactions tend to reduce productivity and growth. It has been demonstrated that taxes on intermediate transactions are inefficient because the same revenue can better be obtained  by taxing income  or consumption. The harm that they cause arises from the fact that they  discourage  transactions that would improve the allocation of resources. For example, capital gains taxes tend to discourage migration to areas where labour is in greater demand by discouraging the buying and selling of houses

Environmental taxation
The purpose of the environmental taxes that were introduced in the latter part of the 20th century was to prevent the loss of economic welfare that would otherwise result from various forms of environmental pollution. They were supplemented in the 21st century by taxes that were introduced to guard against the danger of the very large long-term economic costs of adapting to global temperature rises of several degrees centigrade. A review undertaken for the British government has concluded that the economic costs of measures to avert that outcome will be substantially outweighed by reductions in the cost of adaptation. A review by economists at the National Bureau of Economic Research has concluded that environmental tax revenues do not significantly alter economic constraints on tax policy, and that environmental taxes need to be justified primarily by the cost-effective achievement of environmental goals.

The effect of the tax mix
Empirical evidence suggests that, as between the traditional sources of tax revenue, corporate taxes are the most harmful for growth, followed by personal income taxes, and then consumption taxes, and that property taxes are the least harmful