Politics

Politics has many meanings:  The  most distinctive activity of democracy or peer-to-peer social relations, or a realm of controversy, scandal or rude and unseemly behavior.To some, politics is about the mutual partisan adjustment of living together in communities. For others, it is the art of the possible; a distinct domain of human affairs; the activities of citizens and their leaders (as opposed to subjects who merely obey their rulers) or of citizenship or public action in the public domain, public sector or public sphere. Politics can also be seen as a deeply interwoven aspect or dimension of all human behavior. Some see politics as the interaction of individuals, or groups while others see it in terms of political systems.

Modern political studies in history, political science, political philosophy, social philosophy, political sociology and other fields may focus on analyses of political behavior, political institutions, political systems, political development or other general topics. The American political scientist Charles E. Lindblom sees politics as mutual partisan adjustment (1965). Others, including John Dryzek, the contemporary Australian political philosopher, emphasize processes of discussion and deliberation (1994). Benjamin Barber, an American political philosopher, wrote of "the sovereignty of the political" and the distinctive ways in which virtually any issue or topic can, in short order, be politicized into a matter of controversy and contestation (1988).

Origins
Humans may always have acted politically, but explicit attention to politics has been primarily a matter of living together in larger communities that include those who are strangers, or different from ourselves. In its original meaning the Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle referred to the public affairs of the Athenian community or polis, which others have identified in terms of the civic friendships of the citizen class. Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Politics, individually or together, are regarded as the founding documents of the study of politics by most western authorities, while others outside the West look to ancient Chinese, Indian Persian and other documents as beginning points. Several important medieval European political philosophers included St. Augustine, Benedict of Nursia and others while classical Arab civilization also included a number of important political philosophers, including Ibn Khaldun. The dominant community of much political analysis today is national community, or the nation-state. Machiavelli and Althusius are among important modern sources for understanding politics. The American sociologist Robert Nisbet quotes Althusius saying “Politics is the art of associating men (sic) for the purpose of establishing, cultivating and conserving social life among them. Whence it is called symbiotics. The subject matter of politics is therefore association, in which the symbiotes pledge themselves each to the other, by explicit or tacit agreement, to mutual communication of whatever is useful and necessary for the harmonious exercise of social life.” (Carney, 1964, 12, quoted by Nisbet, 1973, 401) Machiavelli'a name has long been associated with ruthlessness, and anything-goes interpretations of politics, on the strength of his study The Prince. [[Machiavellian is frequently used as an adjective suggesting ruthlessness and a willingness to say or do anything to achieve one's ends. Some authorities have long argued that this is a misreading and in recent decades, the major re-evaluation of the Italian renaissance thinker by the Cambridge historian J.C.A. Pocock (1975) in terms of civic republicanism and what he terms the Atlantic republican political tradition has been gaining ground.

In the Marxist-Leninist tradition of political theory and practice, politics is usually interpreted as superficial appearances representing or masking the real, underlying conflict of class interests.

The subject-matter of modern politics includes the consideration of such philosophical issues  as the extent to which individual conduct should be made subordinate to the will of the community,  and that of the proper rôle of the state as an expression of the will of the community. It also includes the consideration of such practical issues as the formulation and enforcement of rules governing the relations between the individual and the state. It encompasses the sociological influences upon the resolution of those issues in various communities, including the collective beliefs (or ideologies) that are held by  their members. At the operational level, it includes prescriptive issues such as the conditions governing the legitimacy of government; the extent to which collective decision-making should be determined by ethical considerations rather than by its intended consequences; and the consideration that should be given to the welfare of foreign nationals. The descriptive content of politics includes the taxonomy of political systems, of institutional arrangements for the conduct of government, and of the institutions governing the conduct of international relations. It also includes accounts of the observed conduct of politicians in seeking to gain the approval of the community, and in their policy-making  and executive activities when in office.

The main focus of the articles of the politics workgroup is on politics as it is currently practised. There is a strong emphasis on the political viewpoints that Pocock (1975) calls "the Atlantic Republican tradition". Many of these are linked on the Related Articles page attached to this article. This review and a companion article on the history of political thought are concerned with that practice and the developments that have contributed to it.

Etymology
The word politics comes from the Greek word Πολιτικά (politika), which was itself derived from πόλις (polis), "city". It was first used to mean the art of living in a city, but it subsequently acquired the broader interpretation of the art of being a citizen. That broader interpretation was implicit in the use of the word "cosmopolitan" to denote a citizen of the cosmos by the Cynics of the 4th century BCE. Later derivations included the terms "politic", "policy" and "police", and "polity" (a word used by some academics to refer to particular forms of governmental organisation or political system). The term politics itself has also been used colloquially to describe (slightly discreditable) social conduct, as in "office politics" and, when forming a verb, "politicking".

The development of political thought and action
Many existing political systems are the product of long-term piecemeal evolution, and cannot be fully understood without an appreciation of their history. Others, including nearly all modern republics, are the product of intentional breaks with the past and revolutionary and constitutional activity.

Students of history are made aware of the influence of Buddhism, Daoism and Confucianism. However, it is the uninterrupted sequence of development that started with the philosophers of Ancient Greece that provides the evolutionary spine for most of the world's political systems. It was from their word for city (polis) that the term "politics" was derived,  and textbooks on political philosophy and the history of political thought seldom refer to other influences. Although their prescriptions have seldom been adopted, the  concepts  involved and the terms in which they were put forward  became the accepted currency of European political debate. There were further contributions from Ancient Rome - notably the creation of a codified corpus of public law - after the fall of which the development of politics was dominated by the influence of the Roman Catholic Church. The major contribution of the political philosophers of The Enlightenment was the proposition that the legitimacy of government is conditional upon the consent of the governed, and the Glorious Revolution in England, the French Revolution and the American Revolution can be thought of as actions to enforce that principle. The remaining sequence of developments included the establishment of the concept of representative government and of the ideologies of Liberalism,  Conservatism, Socialism and Fascism, and the tentative emergence of a "responsibility to protect" doctrine in the conduct of international relations

Freedom of choice
The fundamental political question  is why an individual should submit to restraints imposed upon him by others. The philosopher Isaiah Berlin has termed such submission the relinquishment of "negative freedom" in order to achieve "positive freedom" - a submission that is analogous to  the exercise of  self-discipline in order to accomplish a task. His answer to that question was that external restraints are accepted  in order  to gain the advantages of cooperation and mutual defence, and he claimed that to be the motivational basis of politics. The concept of a collective voluntary agreement for that purpose, which had been formulated by Jean-Jacques Rousseau as the Social contract,  was a fiction, but it provided the basis for an examination of  ways  of choosing the terms of that  implicit political  agreement. In the middle ages, the prevailing social ideology had precluded the possibility of any departure from existing conventions, but the philosophers of the enlightenment advocated a variety of alternative  political systems, some of which have since been adopted. It is now generally accepted that the true test of any political system is whether its advantages justify the sacrifices of individual freedom that it requires.

The concept of the State
Although originally created by governments, "the State" has acquired a notional existence and authority that  is independent of the  government, the country and  the nation with which it is associated. It was identified by the philosopher Max Weber as the only body capable of the legitimate use of force. In its best-known modern form it has the legal characteristics of a corporation in its ability to enter into every form of legal and commercial transaction in the same way as an individual; and it embodies, in each country,  a set of rules and conventions termed its constitution that  govern the behaviour of its government and the institutions of government; and that can be amended only by its legislature, and usually only by a constitutionally-determined procedure. Beyond those bare essentials there have been many interpretations of the term and many different attitudes to the concept. For Thomas Hobbes  in the 17th century, and for many since then,  it has been  seen solely as a means  of avoiding the chaos of  a  "war of all against all". In France after the French revolution, and in some other European countries,  the means which it serves came to include the protection of citizens against oppression and, according to the Israeli historian, Martin Van Creveld, it became, for a time,  a prized possession "for which they were often prepared to make every sacrifice" including  the "rivers of blood" of two world wars. At the other extreme are those who regard the State as the perpetrator of mass murder which it calls war, enslavement that it calls conscription, and robbery that it calls taxation.

The best-known category  of the state is the stable form that first  emerged in  modern Europe, but Charles Tilly  has described how states have come into existence in a variety of forms and in a variety of circumstances, and has shown that stability is not their universal characteristic. The article on failed states contains many examples of former states that have ceased to operate as such, usually following a major erosion of social capital.

Law
Since the peaceful settlement of disputes is an essential function of politics, a mechanism for deciding and enforcing settlements is a necessary feature of a political system. There must also be a set of rules of conduct determined by a legislature,  interpreted by a judiciary, and  enforced by a police force. Some rules of conduct are determined by deontist principles derived from the moral or religious beliefs of the legislature and some are determined by the consequentialist objective of avoiding harm to others. Within the latter are rules intended to prevent actions that may be expected to result in harm to the community as a whole. The deontist Sharia laws usually figure in the legal systems of countries with predominanty Islamic populations, and deontist laws concerning sexual conduct are to be found in many other countries.

The functions of ideology
A widely accepted set of beliefs  about social behaviour may be termed an ideology if its rationale is known, or a myth if it is not. The term ideology is often associated in people’s minds with dogmatism and intolerance, but in fact, every society has needed a set  of shared assumptions to provide it with a settled view  about living together. That settled view has typically included both conscious beliefs that are topics of everyday discussion, and subconscious attitudes that are seldom examined. It has enabled generally acceptable outcomes to be achieved without debating their underlying rationale. But what group members have considered to be a prized tradition, may  have appeared  to outsiders to be an irrational ideology.

Social ideologies
Myths about personal status and the nature of authority are part of the foundation of every political ideology. For example, the medieval myth of the Chain of Being" which defined the hierarchical  status of every living thing, was the foundation of feudalism, and its subconscious influence is believed to underlie  more recent attitudes to race and gender. And in the nineteenth century, the myth of  "the ladder of life" which envisaged evolution as generating a  process  in which each emerging  type of human being is an improvement on its predecessor, was the rationale for a political ideology of  the survival of the fittest  known as "Social Darwinism" .  The formation of groups has led to "we/they" myths about the superiority of members over non-members   and the creation of ethnic and  nationalist ideologies.

Political ideologies
Several political ideologies have made repeated appearances over the course of history. Aristocracy, in the form of government by a trained elite, was advocated in the 4th century BCE by Plato, and it has since taken a variety of different forms. Although the literal meaning of the term "Theocracy" is the rule of God, its adoption as a political ideology usually means the rule of priestly experts in the interpretation of the God's instructions, such as those of the Islamic Sharia - thus amounting to a particular form of Platonic aristocracy. Democracy, in the form that gave every citizen a right to participate in every communal decision, made a brief appearance in Pericles’ Athens in the 6th century BCE, but was  rejected in that form for centuries thereafter. In particular, the founders of the United States constitution rejected it in favour of "representation ingrafted upon democracy" as advocated in Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man. The concept of representative government, in which the people delegate decision-making powers to an authority on condition that it acts in their interest, had been put forward in the 17th century in the second of John Locke’s treatises On Civil Government and was further  developed  in the 19th century in John Stuart Mill’s Representative Government. The ideology of Socialism, as the belief  that all property should be communally owned, was put forward in the 16th century in Thomas More’s Utopia ; publicised in the early 19th century by Henri de Saint-Simon and developed into an influential creed in Karl Marx’s Das Kapital. . The ideologies of Liberalism and Libertarianism are concerned to preserve individual freedom from state interference. Liberals, such as Friedrich von Hayek , acknowledge the need to impose charges for public goods, whereas some Libertarians such as Robert Nozick question the need to do so. In opposition to those beliefs, the ideology  of Communitarianism  that was put forward by Amitai Etzioni,   lays greater emphasis upon the contribution of community activity to individual welfare.

Legitimacy
The sources of government legitimacy according to the German sociologist Max Weber are charisma, tradition and legality. At a more fundamental level, a government's legitimacy depends upon its continuing ability to perform its side of what is perceived to be the "social contract". Legitimacy once conferred, can be withdrawn for inadequate performance, loss of trust or a change in the public’s interpretation of the contract. In chaotic situations, such as that of Germany at the end of the first world war, legitimacy can be conferred by a successful undertaking to restore order, but can subsequently be withdrawn if the restoration of order ceases to be considered an adequate recompense for hardship or  loss of freedom. Trust can be lost because of what is seen to be misrepresentation,  or because of  the perceived misappropriation  of the community resources by what is termed rent-seeking. Legitimacy is lost by action that is contrary to domestic or international law (although some legal theorists consider international law to be no more than a non-binding system of settling disputes ).

Domestic decision-making
Government conduct has been  influenced as much by  decision-making rationales as by  ideologies -  there have been  tyrannical  democracies and benevolent despotisms. It might appear rational for every government decision to be based upon an evaluation of its expected consequences - a rationale that is termed consequentialism -  but that  rationale is far from being the general rule. Governments have, to varying extents, been influenced by deontism, that is to say by what they perceive to be  principles specifying  actions  that must always to be done or  must always  be avoided. Some such principles originate from religious codes such as the Ten Commandments or the Moslem Sharia, and some are socially-determined  concepts of rights, obligations and duties, such as equity,  fair dealing  and family responsibilities. Consequentialist acceptance of such principles is conditional upon the absence of  significantly  harmful  consequences, but  deontist acceptance is absolute and without exception. The governing principle known as paternalism substitutes the government’s perception of desirable outcomes for that of the governed, either for deontist reasons, or on the ground that the government has the better understanding of the true interests of the governed. At the other extreme is governing behaviour known as populism, under which decisions are influenced by transitory or ill-informed surges of public opinion. Utilitarianism as put forward by John Stuart Mill,  treats all of those influences as aberrations, and advocates decision-making that is directed solely at the improvement of the welfare of those affected as they themselves see it. Under that theory, individuals are deemed to delegate to government the responsibility for determining the material consequences of alternative actions, but  are themselves deemed to  be  the sole judge of the resulting social consequences. That theory is in turn rejected in John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice according to which decisions should conform to the "difference principle" which permits  only those  inequalities of welfare  that benefit the least well-off in the community. Dissenting also from that theory, the philosopher Robert Nozick has argued that each individual has an inalienable right to his own abilities and creations, making it ethically unacceptable for a government to seek to re-allocate the resulting  benefits. The assumption that governments govern on behalf of the governed, is in any case  challenged by  the theory of public choice. That theory assumes that the actions of politicians and civil servants are directed by economic motives, and that they are thus influenced more by self-interest than by a wish to serve the public.

International decision-making
The concept of a sovereign state, free from outside intervention in its domestic affairs, was established in the 17th century by the Treaty of Westphalia, and was endorsed in 1918 by the Covenant of the League of Nations and by Article 2 of the Charter of the United Nations in 1945 with the phrase:
 * "Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state...".

- but in both cases the implied prohibition against intervention was qualified by the approval of collective action to deter aggression. There have since been scores of interventions in the domestic affairs in sovereign states, and the question  of when to intervene has become a major issue in the conduct of international relations. At one extreme is isolationism, which has been Swiss policy for nearly 500 years and was a feature of United States foreign policy in the 19th century and early 20th century. (In neither case was their abstention absolute, however. Switzerland, for example,  is a party to the NATO "Partnership for Peace programme" and has taken part in peacekeeping in Kosovo). The term liberal internationalism has been applied to an idealistically motivated policy of intervention, and at the opposite extreme to that is the policy of self-serving intervention known as "realpolitik" involving the pursuit of the national interest without regard to ethical or humanitarian considerations. A passive and benign variant of realpolitik that has been adopted by successive United States administations, has been termed "realism in international relations", which is a policy of cooperation with other countries  on matters of common concern, without attempting to alter their domestic policies. Another essentially defensive variant is the United States military doctrine for assisting other countries with  their counterinsurgency programmes, known as "Foreign Internal Defense", (FID)''.

A more controversial issue concerns the justification of intervention for humanitarian purposes. There is general agreement on its justification in two circumstances. A United Nations General Assembly resolution places a duty on member states to "prevent and to punish" the crime of genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war and a Convention against Torture, to which 146 countries are party, requires members to arrest and extradite its perpetrators. There is less agreement concerning the treatment of "Crimes Against Humanity" as defined by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, the jurisdiction of which is not accepted by China, India, Israel and the United States, and a number of other states have not fully accepted the Rome Statute. Even more controversial were the conclusions of an international commission that was set up by the Secretary General of the United Nations following the Rwanda genocide and the Srebenica massacre:
 * "State sovereignty implies responsibility, and the primary responsibility for the protection of its people lies with the state itself. Where a population is suffering serious harm, as a result of internal war, insurgency, repression or state failure, and the state in question is unwilling or unable to halt or avert it, the principle of non-intervention yields to the international responsibility to protect."

There is widespread disagreement concerning the existence of such a duty to protect, and concerning the circumstances under which humanitarian intervention is appropriate.

Current forms of government
The various modern forms of government have been categorised in a variety of ways but their most important characteristics concern the  accountability of their  decision-makers. Accountability is what distinguishes personal- and party-autocracies (such as Saudi Arabia and China) from representative democracies (such as the United States and most countries of Europe). While it is not impossible for autocracies to perform the functions of representative government, they have little incentive to do so. Whereas the citizens of autocracies can do nothing to influence the conduct of government, the citizens of democracies can exert a degree of influence through their electoral systems.

The existence of constitutional arrangements for the election of representatives does not, however, guarantee accountability (such arrangements exist in Cuba, for example). The reality depends upon the powers and duties of the elected representatives. Parliamentary democracies whose constitutions follow the example of the Westminster system (such as Canada and India) give the elected representatives both legislative powers and the ultimate sanction of the collective ability to dismiss the government, but often  leave a  government that has a large parliamentary majority with a substantial degree of autonomy.

Countries whose constitutions follow the example of the U.S. Constitution give executive responsibilities to an elected president, and give an elected congress powers to pass laws, and powers of oversight (but not dismissal, except for wrongdoing) over  the president.

A number of countries (including France and Italy) have constitutions that combine the parliamentary characteristics of the Westminster model with the presidential features of the United States model. Most countries have written constitutions that can be amended by their electorates and are subject to interpretation by courts such as the Supreme Court of the United States. Such courts are usually appointed rather than elected, but are constitutionally independent of government control. The provision for the democratic participation of the electorate in decision-making is a prominent feature of the constitution of the Swiss cantons, but in  most democracies  it takes the form of referendums undertaken at the discretion of governments.

Domestic institutions
A categorisation by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson, distinguishes between "inclusive" and "extractive"  national institutions. Power in what they term inclusive political institutions is widely distributed and is regulated by democratic elections. They find that such political institutions have often been associated with economic institutions that embody property rights, contract enforcement, ease of starting new companies, competitive markets, and freedom to take up new occupations. Political power in what they term extractive political institutions is concentrated upon an elite groupings whose decisions tend to be self-serving and not open to challenge, and they have often been associated with  economic institutions that "are structured to extract resources from the many by the few and that fail to protect property rights or provide incentives for economic activity." Acemoglu and Robinson find that the existence of extractive institutions has usually been an obstacle to sustained economic growth.

It has been established from American experience that policy outcomes are also influenced by institutional arrangements such as electoral procedures and conditions of tenure, but the major policy impact has everywhere been achieved by  the multitude of organisations devoted to influencing government policy  by collective action. Groups of people who have beliefs, ideologies or financial interests in common have exerted influence that has often been out of proportion to their numerical strength. (In 1965 the economist Mancur Olson stimulated interest in such organisations by a book in which he stressed the limited incentive for a member to pull his weight in a large group, and concluded that small groups are easier to organise. The subject has since been extensively explored by sociologists and others.   ).  Interest groups representing specific interests can contribute to the effectiveness of government by supplying it with specialised knowledge, but their main purpose is what has been termed rent-seeking, or seeking a sectional advantage at the expense of the rest of the community. The success in that respect of any particular pressure group has been shown to depend upon the activities of competing groups. Farming lobbies have been the most successful of the industrial pressure groups in most developed countries and, probably next in importance have been the environmental pressure groups such as Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth . The major political pressure groups have of course been the political parties and different party systems have emerged in different countries. The influence of their electoral systems upon the political parties was explored in the 1960s by the French political scientist Maurice Duverger whose major finding, known as Duverger’s Law, was that a first-past-the-post or "plurality electoral system" tends to favour two-party political systems, whereas proportional representation systems tend to favour multi-party politics. Differing forms of proportional representation have been adopted by the major European countries except France and Britain and has normally given rise to multi-party systems and coalition governments, whereas pluralist voting and two-party systems have been the general rule in the United States, Canada, Britain and Australia.

International Institutions
Changes to international relations during the twentieth century have embodied a recognition of growing interdependence. Clusters of local alliances have given way to the concept of extensive mutual defence, there has been a gradual erosion of the concept of the sovereignty of nation states, and there has been increased concern about humanitarian issues. Those trends were reflected in the 1945 charter of the United Nations which proposed world-wide mutual defence, an international court for settling disputes, the protection of refugees, and the prevention and punishment of genocide. Member states have not implemented the original intention to create a military back up for  those measures, except on a selective ad hoc basis, and in other respects, the intentions behind the charter have been only partially realised. The constitution of the International Court of Justice does not make it compulsory to accede to a request for   the submission of disputes, and the rulings of the court are not binding. The United Nations has had limited success in attempts to prevent any of the 17 subsequent genocides and it was not until 2002 that a court  was set up to enable those responsible to be prosecuted. The constitution of the United Nations initially prohibited all intervention in states' domestic affairs, but a commission set up by its Secretary General has since recommended that where a population is suffering serious harm, the principle of non-intervention should give way to "the responsibility to protect" The principle international economic institutions are the World Trade Organisation which develops and regulates agreements concerning trade barriers, the International Monetary Fund which is concerned to maintain exchange stability, and provides temporary financial assistance to countries to help ease balance of payments adjustment, and the  World Bank which provides financial and technical assistance to developing countries. The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) is a mutual defence institution involving 26 countries in North America and Europe. There are also a number of regional institutions that promote various forms of cooperation, including Free Trade Area of the Americas, the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) , the Organisation of African Unity  , and the European Union , part of which is also a common currency area.

Political Conduct
There are important aspects of politics that are not determined by ideology or institutions. They include campaigning techniques and legislative conduct.

Campaigning
The subject of political tactics was extensively examined by Jeremy Bentham in the nineteenth century and the subject was systematically developed by Anthony Downs in his 1957 book An Economic Theory of Democracy. . The best-known of his conclusions was his "median voter theory" which claimed that the winning party in a two-party election would be the party that positioned  itself the closer to the views of the median voter. The subject has since been widely explored, and the political analyst Jennifer Lees-Marchment has used marketing theory to identify  three campaigning strategies:
 * product-oriented strategy concentrating on devising effective policies,
 * sales-oriented strategy focused on publicising the merits of existing policies
 * market-oriented strategy seeking to find out what the public wants and to adjust policies accordingly

The use of marketing professionals for political purposes, which is believed to have originated in the 1960 Kennedy-Nixon Presidential contest,  had spread to Britain and elsewhere by the 1970s. Much use was made of focus groups to assess popular reactions to policy proposals, but mainly among uncommitted groups  and in marginal constituencies. Considerable efforts were put into influencing public opinion by speeches, and television appearances and mainly by news management or "spin". News management techniques described by Professor Ivor Gabor include  rebuttal of opponents’ criticisms, building-up and undermining personalities, kite-flying to gauge public reactions to rumoured proposals, and the timing of announcements to divert attention from bad news. However, adverse public reactions to spin may have since placed some constraint upon the use of such techniques.

Legislative conduct
Legislative conduct has been shown to be strongly influenced by institutional arrangements. Party unity is more important in parliamentary systems, which give parliaments the power to dismiss governments, than in presidential systems in which the president retains office for a fixed term. Where party unity is important, party members are often put under pressure by party whips to support declared policies, and party attitudes to new proposals are commonly settled behind closed doors in meetings of the party caucus. Where party unity is less strong, legislative debating is more open, but logrolling conspiracies to gain local advantages are more common. Debates are conducted in accordance with procedural codes such as Robert's Rules of Order or Erskine May that are designed to preserve order, and the conduct of legislators is regulated by codes of legislative ethics that are designed to curb corruption.