User talk:Roger A. Lohmann/Archive 2

[User bio is in User:Your Name]

Welcome
You can find some more information about our collaboration groups if you follow this link CZ:Workgroups.You can always ask me on my talk page or others about how to proceed or any other question you might have.

Have fun and Happy editing!

--Matt Innis (Talk) 23:08, 6 June 2007 (CDT)

--Larry Sanger 10:19, 20 July 2007 (CDT)

Butler Article: Approval sought
Hi Dr Lohmann! I see you've recently become active.

I've been asked to have butler nominated for approval. I assume it's in sociology, so I need a soc editor. Would you be kind enough to have a look?

Thank you.

Aleta Curry 21:53, 9 August 2007 (CDT)


 * Welcome and congratulations on a generally excellent entry. I'm new as an editor too, and I'll have to work my way through the approval process, so please bear with me. Meanwhile, I note one apparent omission among your roster of fictional butlers that P.G. Wodehouse fans will find particularly grating. Bertie Wooster's man Jeeves doesn't appear to be there. (I see a reference to Move Over Jeeves, but not to the original. Wodehouse fans would seriously challenge your statement, for example, that Alfred, Critchton and are better known than the redoubtable Jeeves, who serves in many respects as the model for many of the movie butlers you list.


 * Unless I've missed something, this is an oversight you will definitely want to correct.


 * Also, (and this is much more along the lines of an optional suggestion): Do you think there might be a place for a brief "And The Butler Did it" exploration of the place of butlers, and more generally household staff, in mystery fiction? (This might be a possible signed article by a regular reviewer of mystery novels at one of the major newspapers, for example.)


 * Meanwhile, I'll get started on figuring out the approval process.
 * Roger Lohmann 06:25, 10 August 2007 (CDT)

Thank you so much! I have high hopes for this grand experiment, and hope it is successful. I have a distinct disadvantage, not being a technocrat--I keep reminding the boys not to speak so much computer-ese!

Your suggestions are marvelous. Please note that I most certainly did NOT forget the redoubtable Jeeves! It's just that Jeeves is a valet, not a butler. However, I'm sure lots of authors will be trying to add him in. Do you think that I should refer to this in the article?

"The Butler Did It!" Yes, certainly, sounds like a plan.

I also intend to write valet, housekeeper...all the "traditional" servants, in fact.

Would great house also come under your purview? I assume it would. Sorry for my ignorance, but my few sociology courses were generally in sociology and film--crossover courses. When I went to school there was no film department, so my film minor comprised courses in different departments: literature and film, philosophy and film, etc. I'm afraid I don't really know what's sociology and what's social anthropology.

Thanks again for your help.

Aleta Curry 17:20, 10 August 2007 (CDT)

Hi Roger. Would you consider changing the approval date for Butler until say, the 20th? I'd like to tighten that article up more. &mdash;Stephen Ewen (Talk) 05:22, 13 August 2007 (CDT)

Theodor Lohmann
Hi Roger. I've started reading through the Lohmann article, creating templates and subpages, and adding CZ-links as I go along. There is one passage that reads: ''He belonged to the ?????? faction of the Evangelical Evangelisch-Lutheran regional church in Hanover and was involved in the assistance of youth and old people and vocational training.'' Which faction is meant here? I couldn't find it in the German WP or the BBKL. Arne Eickenberg talk  09:12, 1 September 2007 (CDT)


 * Great! I thought subpages might be a good idea, but wasn't sure if this was the sort of article that lended itself to such treatment. The faction comment was one of the passages I was most concerned about. The other is the Robert Bosse quote and T.L.'s response. There seems to be a good bit of vernacular speech there, and I'm not at all sure if I captured the sense of what they were saying.


 * Also, in checking the editorial history in the German Wikipedia entry, it appears that most of that article was done by a single author, whom I cited. I don't know if that is appropriate or not. Advice is welcome.
 * Roger Lohmann 11:44, 1 September 2007 (CDT)


 * a) I edited the quote and response to account for the vernacularity. b) Can you point me to the German name of the protestant faction? I seemed to have missed that one. c) added image. d) We don't need to cite the original WP author because we don't know his/her real name. (see also my remark on the article's talk page.) The WP article seems to be mainly based on the BBKL entry, so you should either cite the BBKL author or (which would be better) further edit the article, include more sources etc. Arne Eickenberg  talk  12:48, 1 September 2007 (CDT)


 * I've gone about as far as I can go with this one. It doesn't appear that we know much more in English and the translations have been A bit of editorial cleaning up, and some attention to the sub-pages and it should be finished as a Version 1.1.
 * Roger Lohmann 21:52, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

Subpages
In reply to your query at Talk:Nonprofit, not-for-profit, voluntary, independent: I never used the template, but I have a rough idea of how it works. It seems you did not see the instructions of the template, which can be found at Template:Subpages9. You did the first step. The second step is to create Template:Nonprofit, not-for-profit, voluntary, independent/Metadata and to put the  block there. Once you have created it, the mess should go away. -- Jitse Niesen 01:36, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

Jane Addams
Hi Roger. Your attention is needed here. Thanks, --Matt Innis (Talk) 16:01, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

I just noticed that the related articles for this article need definitions added. This needs to happen before approval but should not take too long since they should be very concise. See Biology/Related Articles for an example. Chris Day (talk) 16:13, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

Roger, your attention is needed. If you could leave me a note to let me know which version to approve that would be great. Thanks, Matt Innis (Talk) 21:34, 8 September 2007 (CDT)

Approved! Congratulations. Keep them coming! --Matt Innis (Talk) 22:11, 8 September 2007 (CDT)

metadata template
Roger, on the metadata template under the ToApprove section where it says 'ToAeditor', just put your name 'Roger Lohmann' rather than the four tildes. The template takes care of the rest. --Matt Innis (Talk) 08:14, 12 September 2007 (CDT)

PS. Same with the 'Approved' section. --Matt Innis (Talk) 08:15, 12 September 2007 (CDT)

Foundation mess
Hi! By doing a cut-n-paste move of Foundation to Foundation (Construction), you've disconnected the article from its history and removed the actual article from people's (my) watchlists. I'm going to ask a constable to repair the damage; please do not edit the article until then.

I need a constable for this, because the process requires restoring the original content of the article at Foundation, deletion of the Foundation (Construction) article, moving the Foundation article to Foundation (Construction), then recreating the Foundation article as the disambiguation page you created. I'll be contacting a constable for the deletion shortly. Anthony Argyriou 16:24, 13 September 2007 (CDT)


 * Sorry for the slightly snippy tone earlier. As I've decided that Foundation (Structure) was a better title, I was able to fix everything without the intervention of a constable, except for deleting the orphaned Foundation (Construction). In the future, please do page moves using the "move" tab, rather than cut-n-paste moves, to preserve the page history and other links. Thanks, Anthony Argyriou 16:54, 13 September 2007 (CDT)

Congrats!
On your article approval! Ready for another one :-) --Matt Innis (Talk) 08:28, 2 October 2007 (CDT)

Write-a-thon, again!
Hi Roger! You got any Zinfandel left? Bring it to the party! Aleta Curry 05:41, 3 October 2007 (CDT)

subpages template response
I'm not sure if you saw the response on my talk page. But, as Matt Innis replied the subpages template is used on all subpages to make it easier to navigate to the other subpages and main article within the cluster. This also puts the subpages category on the page as well as any relevant workgroup timeline categories.Matt Mahlmann 17:21, 1 November 2007 (CDT)

Commons/Related
Yes, I can delete that for you. What you do (so you don't have to hunt anybody down) is add the speedydelete template to the Talk page and a constable will delete it when they check their duties. I'll let you try it on this one for practice. Also, it seems that you created me another talk page :) so you can do that one too if you want! --Matt Innis (Talk) 19:46, 1 November 2007 (CDT)

I also added the subpages to the Pittsburgh articles! Good catch. --Matt Innis (Talk) 20:16, 1 November 2007 (CDT)

PS: I forgot to tell you to take out the tl| to make it show up. --Matt Innis (Talk) 06:48, 2 November 2007 (CDT)

Congratulations again!
On your editorship in politics! --Matt Innis (Talk) 14:08, 5 November 2007 (CST)

More good news!
Civil society is approved! Congratulations X3. This has been a good month for you :-) --D. Matt Innis 17:59, 16 November 2007 (CST)

Welcome back! Hope you had a nice break ;-) --D. Matt Innis 21:36, 18 November 2007 (CST)

Try it again
Roger, try putting the subpages on Rural poverty. When you go to the metadata page, instead of typing the name, copy and paste it from the title at the top. Sometimes it doesn't recognize our keyboard strokes, but it knows what it 'types'. I'll watch to see what happens. --D. Matt Innis 22:00, 18 November 2007 (CST)


 * Matt, Cutting and Pasting the page name seemed to do it for Rural poverty. Thanks. I'll clear up the other Unchecklisted pages later today.
 * Roger Lohmann 09:37, 19 November 2007 (CST)

December Party!
Hi Roger--Now, I know you're on top of this, but when you wake the December party will be in full swing--I hope! Do stop by! Aleta Curry 01:57, 5 December 2007 (CST)

Possible article for approval
I see that you are listed as an editor in the History Workgroup. That's good news, because I'd like to see the Andrew Carnegie article move toward approval. It's primarily authored by Richard Jensen, so he isn't eligible to approve the article and I think you would be an excellent person to do the job, given the subject of the article. --Joe Quick 00:37, 20 December 2007 (CST)
 * I've decided it looks good enough to approve quickly. I hope you will concur, and join with me in approving it. If you have any reservations, do tell me and we can delay the process. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 21:52, 5 January 2008 (CST)